Vote: Dimos (seriously) He bluntly said that he was a good guy... which means he's a bady.
In the great wisdom of the playground 'Ye who smelt it, dealt it.'
Therefore Vote: The Khan
Double A: Nervous. Perhaps something to hide. And insulting my RP'ing skillz. There's something strange about this one, watch him carefully guys.
Who has the greatest deductive mind in the world then?
Clearly he was on to something for a trap to be sprung, where was he found? or had he moved to that position?
I think Double A has something to hide, thus he is posting so strange posts...
like: ''It's awfuly quiet today'' and ''askthepizzaguy . If you don't know him, that's a personal issue''
he also said: ''Anyway, what's up with the complete and total lack of random lynching?''
and he voted for CN2 for being the first to propose peace -no lynch- . Possibly if he's scum then he wanted me and the Khan to eat each other like dogs so as he will gloriously murder some people during the night...
I wish to pass off my post earlier as inexperience my good CN2. I have never gone through a harrowing experience before, only arranged them for others.
I'd like to point out Visorslash that my comment was taken, entirely out of context.
(I was trying to say in character that I haven't played Mafia before, only run it for others.)
Further, CN2 good chap, while you give reasons for what could potentially be seen as a bandwagon vote, which I do not hold against you in any way, shape or form at all my good man, I would like to know what would constitute a convincing defence? I was not aware of doing something wrong. :(
Quite honestly, I am starting to perhaps reconsider my position on Double A. Although his willingness to vote when we have basically nothing to go on is a little disoncerting.
Have a good day chaps and chapette,
That clarifies your strange comment a bit then. I am less suspicious of you now I know what you meant, rather than what it seemed like you meant.
I feel as though Double A is very eager for a lynching, which I guess isn't a bad thing considering we need to do something after losing Sherlock Holmes in the night :( . The only thing is, we need to be careful as we can't risk losing another powerful townie to a rushed lynching.
Having said that, I don't think he seems particularly suspicious. Certainly there are more suspicious people around and things happening, such as Dimos (simply because of what Double A himself said - not really huge suspicion, but certainly more than I see around Double A), or Nightangel's random bandwagoning.
Visorslash: Well I have explained my comment so I hope that he would be so kind as to retract his vote.
Double A is naturally defensive from what I said earlier, so his perspective may be a little skewed as he doesn't want to risk having the mob side against him. This is fair enough so I propose to retract my suspicions until a later date in return for Double A to retract his slanders too. Would you be amenable to this Double A?
Sorry to comment again but I realised that in my rambling I forgot to reply to Double A's point. (I have run a few games in real life after dinner but they were all over very quickly, with very little conniving going on. I have also run the two Wibbulniblia games on here, both of which had an excess of cunning plans)
Ok, Double A, I'll have it your way. VOTE: Phoenixguard09 ... Let him be revealed...
PS: Hope your arguments are true, and he is the scum, elsewise I think you must be lynched for misleading the public.
You may not edit your posts.
Hell to the yeah! :D
RULES
- When a player reaches 50% of the votes, they are lynched and day ends.
- Vote in the format Vote: Player X, preferably in bold and red. Votes in bold OR red but not both will still be counted because I'm a lovely person, but votes without bolding or being in red will not be counted.
- Days and nights will be about 3 days each.
- You may roleclaim at will.
- You may NOT discuss the game outside the thread unless it is SPECIFICALLY allowed in your role.
- You will ALL have ability-based roles. There is no such thing as a normal townie on this voyage. Good heavens, no!
- If you're not sure whether you're allowed to do something, ASK ME FIRST.
- This is probably one of the most unpredictable game setups you will ever play, due to the large number of interesting night roles. Simple logic may not be enough.
- As an addition to that, this could be a very long or a very short game, I've no idea. Welcome along for the ride, ladies and gentlemen.
- Finally, speaking in good English is just good cricket, don'tcha know.
what were you trying to do?
I'm too tired and sick right now to do much more than this post.
Seriously, this is the fourth time in two weeks that I've vomited in the morning. What the hell, body?
OoC:Spoiler (click to show/hide)
Which means that if the HAWK is scum, the next one will be the Khan... Or even worse if she isn't the Khan can be an over-agressive killer, taking advantage of the weak position of the HAWK, for he started the attack against me since the day 1.
C'mon guys! Another vote to lynch and send this cold-blooded killer to meet the Dog-Fish Sharks of the Aegean Sea! :)
Elenia Kalazis
It's night time. Shh.
Since your masonic claim was undisputed, I will take a little gamble and trust you.
I am the vigilante. The first night, I attacked CN2 (or maybe Dimnos) more or less randomly. He was protected by a military-looking man (I assume it was Khan). Second night I attacked someone (can't remember who & didn't save the PM - may have been Khan or ladyhawk) but was roleblocked. Third night, I attacked Khan, but wound up shooting Dimnos instead (the room's nameplates were switched). My write-up says he was just "lying there" in his bed, so it may have been before or after the poison.
This leads me to believe Floam's roleclaim, for only he would know about the bussing action. However, I've heard of mafia bussers before, which means I still find him suspicious. Most of the game he hasn't been active. He voted for ladyhawk, but I strongly believe the thief was not connected in any way to the mafia (3rd party) because it simply makes sense - thieves typically work alone. He also could have done so to build credibility.
Furthermore, this post is really, really weird:
Quote from: Floam on November 07, 2011, 08:00:29 AM
I agree, and staying silent doesn't seem to be doing anybody any good, its the quiet ones who've gone so far... I'll vote Ladyhawk, too, as us good'uns must stick together, so surely must the bad'uns...
Son of the King was fairly active (5 posts) the first two days but dropped off the face of the earth on D3. As hawk was also a lurker, this leads me to believe he could be a Scumasaurus Rex. However, I'd rather vote for him tomorrow to see if he reacts. If he does, he's a lurker and needs to be lynched. If he doesn't, he simply lost track of the game and can be safely ignored.
Visorslash has the same case as SotK, but I know him more. He's usually active. His earlier posts lead me to believe he is innocent and simply forgot about the game. Test vote should be done tomorrow.
Nightangel's ability is weird. It's so weird it might be believable. However, when something is so weird you believe it, it usually isn't real. This leads to the natural conclusion that it is real due to its unbelievability. Since paradoxical logic must be used, the only truly logical conclusion is that he's creating a WIFOM to screw with my head and needs to be shot out of a cannon. His post saying "No you fool, I am innocent!" isn't doing his case any favors at all.
comrade_general has done nothing but lurk, spam, and vote throughout the entire game. I have no idea what he normally does, but if he's usually more active and helpful, he needs to die. He voted for PG09 and got confused today. Seems like he would usually just go with the flow, latching on to bandwagons with semi-decent cases whenever he can.
This is the level of trust I have in people:
1. Me
2. You
3. c_g
4. Visor
5. SotK
6. Nightangel
7. Floam
Thoughts?
...in this case, do yourself a favor: Put aside logic. Do what feels right.