I've seen that site before, I was quite shocked at how bad the "proofs" are. First of all, many claiming to have been found in the Bible before the science are just plain wrong, as for example the idea of atoms as invisible particles making everything up has been around since ancient Greece, which was long before the Bible was written in the first place, and the edition being quoted was printed in the 1600s anyway, so some of the earlier discoveries were probably already discovered at the time of printing. Then, most of the rest are either untrue in itself, have a completely nonsensical quote, have a quote which doesn't indicate the actual scientific theory or finally have a quote which somehow is relatable, but show a lack of understanding on the knowledge. I'd also like to point out that as a good half are in the Old testament, Judaism also shares these "proofs" (and I think Islam also will, I'm unsure on this though).
Obvious/Already Known:
Lightning and Thunder are related - This is like saying that fish live in the sea. It doesn't take a genius to figure that the light and noise which consistently follows it are related.
Matter is made of invisible particles - I already pointed this out
Both man and woman possess the seed of life - Considering that both genders were at the time required for procreation, this isn't a staggering revelation
Quarantine of Diseases - This was done with sufferers of leprosy even in very ancient times.
Wrong/Non-existent Theories:
Blood is necessary for life - Tell that to a single celled organism
There is a place void of stars in the North - The Hubble Deep-field seems to disagree with this
The oceans have natural paths in them - What?
Infinite number of stars - Due to entropy, there is not actually an unlimited number of stars
Snow has material value - What does this even mean? Igloos?
Dust is necessary to survive - What? Admittedly, it builds the immune system, but the quote just talks about God measuring how much dust there is.
Most Shipworthy ship - This seems to be entirely made up, google offers no hints as to this theory being around. If it is real, then I would put this down to a coincidence.
Nonsensical Quotes/Quotes which don't back up theory:
Certain Animals carry diseases deadly to man - The quote goes on about not eating certain animals for cleanliness, not disease.
Blood of animals carries diseases - As above
Earth was in nebular form to begin with - It says all was dark, if you can name a nebula which is made of darkness, I commend you.
Light is a particle and has mass - Nowhere in the quote does it state light having mass, it just asks where light lives.
Radio Astronomy - it talks about stars singing, not emitting radiation. To be quite honest, quotes saying the stars shine is nearer the mark.
Hubert Spencer's Survival of the Fittest - Genesis 1 talks about God making everything, not survival of the fittest in any way.
Light can be split into colours - Rainbows? Also, the quote simply says parted, not parted into the individual colours.
Plants use sunlight to manufacture food - The quote actually splits up the speaking of sun and a branch. This to me indicates the lack of evidence in the Bible.
Life originated in the sea - God made the sea creatures first, which is apparently the same as evolution starting in the sea?
Taxonomic Classification - Nowhere in this quote is anything resembling taxonomy mentioned.
Misinterpretations:
While arguably most the evidence could go here, this was made specifically for one. This was a blatant misinterpretation:
Arcturus and other stars move through space - The quote is fairly obviously talking about how stars appear to move across the sky, not how they genuinely move through space
Air has weight - Although this one I'm not sure on, I'm pretty sure the quote is referring to the force the wind seems to have.
The ocean containing freshwater springs is the only proof which I can say passes my test, however this is also probably wrong due to a lack of subject knowledge. My criticism would be it doesn't specifically state freshwater, the Bible could be referring to salllamaer springs, and there could have been such a freshwater spring near the authors of the Bible, not really predicting as such.
I'd also like to say I am no way trying to alter your beliefs, I'm merely questioning the evidence apparently found supporting the Bible, as one should following the scientific method.