My version is far more realistic, for there's nothing better than having people as they are, social by nature.
Sorry, just wanted to quote this because I disagree most strongly. If we're all kings then in no way should we be wondering around the wilderness. That's not realistic at all. I'd also like to point out that this is not my version of the game, it is a community project so that the players can have a voice. In the interest of fun for the players (which is of course the reason the game exists) surely the players themselves have some ideas regarding what they would like?
Well, it's not realistic for a King to go on campaign? That's riduclus... That's after the middle ages, when kings were staying home... Or do you propose that King William the Conqueror or Alexander the Great were not Kings? They were both Kings and Generals, that's realism. I'm remind you that most Kings during the middle ages were energetic and had full controll of their armies... Unlike some Louis the 17th or so who lost his Kingdom to the French Revolution... He was staying at home...
Players are encouraged to propose ideas, and I openly ask for ideas. New buildings, items, possiby mining rectangles, and whatever else are welcome. Even a crafting system based on ''recipes'' about how an item will be self-made. Even self made coins... Will be nice, unless it will make the game very complex. That will require resources, trading and moving trough the map and generally some sort of social organazation...
I think NightAngel is the best for the Job, for he can hold such a responsibility and he seams more impartial than me or PG09. I think he , If he follows the set rules can become the best moderator for such a game...
I am also working on a new map, or possibly we'll improove the already existing one. A real-world map would also be nice... If we'll have around 12 players next time, I think the game will be just awesome...
EDIT: IMO, the HILL RPG is the best game out there!!