As may or may not be surprising, I checked the constitution first.
My position is that I was acting under section 6c - that is to say, I was acting for what I believe to be the benefit of the site as a whole, and it's not something the citizens have told me I can't do therefore as long as I'm considered to be acting on behalf of the site, I can. The citizens can tell me to reverse my decision, or can decide that it was an abuse of power that I should be censured or removed for, should they so wish, and there's not much I can do about that.
Of course, if anyone wishes to run a test case past the tribounoi, or legislate against future occurrences of this, they're welcome. I just feel it's bad for the site to have "feminazi" or equivalent aggressive terms like "commie scum", "tory armadillobags" etc plastered over the front page, particularly at the moment when numbers on the site are low.
My position on the actual thread topic is actually moderate agreement - that is to say, I think to claim there was no link between games and real life degrading women would be a bit of a stretch, but I think it's primarily the reverse of the one being suggested. I do not think that fantasy games and books tend to cause problematic behaviour in real life, but I think they are always reflective of the culture they're made in. So I'm not much a fan of games where you get points by beating up hookers, but I think that (particularly with regard to sex work) changing the law and real-world culture is where attention should be focussed; moralising about product sales is probably largely counterproductive.