I'd bet my future house on the fact that Tibetans etc. are not well represented.
Take a look at what's going on, at The Town Crier!
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Jubal on February 21, 2014, 12:29:52 AM
The Union debate tonight was on the motion "This house regrets the Arab Spring."
Defeated 168-59, which I was quite pleased about; a Kievan discussing it afterwards was noting the important similarities.
Quote from: TTG4 on February 03, 2014, 03:12:38 PMQuote from: Will on February 03, 2014, 02:27:55 PM
Humans also respond to pathogen specific motifs, maybe not the same ones as plants do. I don't know very much about plants to be honest.
Humans have the disadvantage of having cells that are much easier to infect, which is kind of countered by immune cells, but it seems to me to be less effective. But I'm biased, plant pathogens are something of an obsession of mine!
Quote from: Silver Wolf on January 31, 2014, 06:52:58 PM
It is also possible that this disorder evolved as a genetic response to endemic malaria.
Quote from: Silver Wolf on January 31, 2014, 05:35:02 PM
The population there (black people) usually shrugs it off very easily.
Quote from: TTG4 on December 05, 2013, 11:53:52 PM
Related: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/nov/27/brian-cox-science-funding-grants-nonsensical
Coming from someone in the final year of their degree and looking for masters funding (having found it nigh on impossible) this hits pretty badly. only hope Osborne doesn't go further and start cutting research funding, heck funding applications are already annoying enough, if you work on animals mention cancer, if you work on plants mention food security. If you can't do either, you're in trouble!
What are peoples views? Do you think we're approaching a crisis of science funding? Or do you think that science has to pay a price in the current austerity-obsessed climate?